Santiago Capital

Santiago Capital

Stethoscopes to Supercomputers: How AI is creating the next big medical investing wave

Uncover the leading AI Healthcare Investment Opportunities. This in-depth report shows the sectors set for rapid adoption, major ROI, and long-term investment potential.

Santiago Capital's avatar
Santiago Capital
Dec 03, 2025
∙ Paid

Executive Summary

Artificial Intelligence has spent the past several years capturing global attention, generating endless headlines about its breakthroughs in entertainment, productivity, and general automation.

Yet the most consequential transformation is unfolding almost unnoticed.

Healthcare, the sector with perhaps the greatest potential for AI-driven change, has remained oddly peripheral in the public conversation. This is striking because no industry stands to benefit more.

Across Pharmaceutical R&D, diagnostics, patient management, and even complex surgical intervention, AI is beginning to reshape the foundations of modern medicine.

The forces driving this transition are powerful and unavoidable.

Healthcare faces unsustainable economic and operational pressures, and AI offers a direct path to relief.

Generative chemistry promises to shorten the decade-long, multi-billion-dollar burden of drug discovery.

Advanced robotics and automation offer a way to democratize specialized medical expertise that is traditionally scarce and unevenly distributed.

Intelligent administrative tools present a rare chance to strip out the systemic inefficiencies that currently consume up to one-third of total healthcare spending.

These incentives have propelled institutions into an accelerating shift toward an AI-driven model of care.

However, the full potential of this transformation collides with a fundamental paradox.

The most powerful AI systems are built to continuously learn and evolve, yet the regulatory and legal structures that govern healthcare are designed to evaluate static products. Regulators require a fixed, fully specified system at the moment of approval. Adaptive AI, which improves as it encounters new data, does not fit this paradigm.

The FDA’s Predetermined Change Control Plan represents an attempt to address this tension, but the framework is complex, rigid, and demanding.

It requires developers to predict and pre-specify the entire future evolution of their models, which constrains the very agility that makes these systems so effective.

This regulatory challenge is magnified by the industry’s most pressing technical constraint.

High-performing AI requires large volumes of diverse, high-quality clinical data. Yet privacy regulations such as HIPAA and GDPR, combined with intense competitive behavior among health systems, have created deep data silos.

Critical information remains locked within institutions, preventing the creation of robust, generalizable models and increasing the risk of algorithmic bias when systems trained on narrow datasets are deployed in new settings.

Federated Learning has emerged as the most practical solution to this impasse. By allowing institutions to train shared models without exchanging raw patient data, it offers a path to collaboration that satisfies privacy constraints and protects proprietary information.

Federated Learning has already demonstrated its potential across major initiatives, including multi-billion-dollar drug discovery collaborations like the MELLODDY consortium and global diagnostic challenges such as FeTS, which validate its ability to create accurate, diverse, privacy-preserving models across multiple organizations.

Yet Federated Learning is not a turnkey remedy. Its deployment introduces technical challenges that are far from trivial.

Variations in patient populations, clinical workflows, and medical hardware create significant data heterogeneity, which in turn destabilizes model convergence across sites.

The approach also increases exposure to advanced security threats, including model inversion attacks that attempt to reconstruct sensitive patient information from shared gradients.

Mitigating these risks requires costly defenses such as Differential Privacy and Secure Multi-Party Computation.

The operational burden is equally significant.

To participate in Federated Learning, hospitals must invest heavily in new computing infrastructure and establish rigorous protocols for coordination, synchronization, and network reliability. These demands create friction that slows adoption and risks concentrating the benefits of AI among only the most well-resourced health systems.

The path forward is clear but demanding. For AI to achieve its full potential in healthcare, the industry must solve the combined challenges of regulatory rigidity, data fragmentation, technical complexity, and operational cost.

The opportunity is enormous, but without deliberate, coordinated action, the benefits will accrue unevenly.

The central strategic imperative is to build a framework that enables innovation while upholding safety, privacy, equity, and trust.

Only then will AI’s transformative power extend beyond isolated pilot programs and reach the patients and populations who stand to gain the most.

This post is for subscribers in the Santiago Capital Pro plan

Already in the Santiago Capital Pro plan? Sign in
© 2025 Brent Johnson · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture